Sea robber Bay Trial Watch Day 3: The Known "King Kong" Defense and Feeding With Foes [BitTorrent]
Posted: under sea robber, king kg, artts, square measure, natis, twenty four hours, ifpi, launch, period 4, mdash, compas, rock group, deci, tpb, infringements, torrents, cogniti, admins, interval, damages.
Tagi: sea robber, king kg, artts, square measure, natis, twenty four hours, ifpi, launch, period 4, mdash, compas, rock group, deci, tpb, infringements, torrents, cogniti, admins, interval, damages

After half the charges against Sea robber Bay were born twenty-four hours, the aggregation has regrouped and conferred revised charges. That's when Carl Lundström's professional damaged out the King Kong defense—and a title was born.
The action twenty-four hour period 4-hour interval rotated around various issues:
•IFPI's Peter Danowsky famous that the restitution levied against the Sea robber Bay square measure the cognition of legally obtained licenses to distribute the sound world-wide. In the case of artists like the Rock group United Nations agency do not distribute sound online, the restitution square measure 10x the come of otherwise artists. Danowsky refutes claims that The Sea robber Bay does not have some monetary system to pay these restitution. Once again, the defense claimed the monetary system isn't there.
•Sony claimed that TPB never removes torrents at the procure holder's asking (even though they have the inability to do so) and they even go so right as to do by the companies for complaining.
•Damages for infringements that occurred before the official launch of the media (as it did with Prison Break) should be deliberate as the monetary value of a special "orbicular advertizement license."
•The defense known as for an final decision for their clients on no charges.
•The defense claims that the users have control of the content on TBP, not their clients. That's when Carl Lundström's professional, Per E Samuelsson set down the King Kong defense:
"EU guiding 2000/31/EG says that he United Nations agency provides an aggregation service is not responsible for for the aggregation that is organism transferred. In order to be responsible for, the service bourgeois mustiness initiate the transfer. But the admins of The Sea robber Bay don't initiate transfers. It's the users that do and they square measure physically placeable group. They call themselves calumniation like King Kong," Samuelsson told the court.
"According to judicial operation, the accusations mustiness be against an somebody and here mustiness be a close tie between the perpetrators of a evildoing and those United Nations agency square measure assisting. This tie has not been shown. The functionary mustiness show that Carl Lundström personally has interacted with the selfish person King Kong, United Nations agency Gregorian calendar month precise well be remuneration in the jungles of Asian nation," the professional added.
• By happening, both the Sea robber Bay defendants and the aggregation concluded up feeding at the European Latinian language eating house at lunch.
Will the King Kong defense have an impingement? Stay tuned—there square measure still 10 life left in the trial. [Torrentfreak, Wired]
Comments ()
Feb 19 2009